Mon cherie a Paris

It is I, Leclerc!
   

<< May 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



May 27, 2004
Possible paper stuff

Thinking the last weeks about sites and advertising and triggering people to their products I couldn't really get hold of the subject. Wondering about the determined outcome(see previous entry this day) of this participate subjects, seeing no original entrance, because we discussed it so many times in class, I sort of panicked about my paper.

With the help of someone up there, I got this email from a website I never visited and they put my attention on this mobile TV. The mobile TV in itself isn't a novelty. Ten years ago you saw sporadically, really hip people(...), with this handhelds, only able to see channel 1,2,3, in a rather poor state to. Combining mobile phones, wireless digital technology and TV is a very interesting one. One could question the expected succes, but it's filosophical implications and it's technical opportunities makes it very interesting.
The mobile TV never became a groundbreaking succes. Why? I can only wonder. The limited amount of channels? The not so astonishing screen quality? The price? Or is it just that people don't want to watch TV "on the road"? I have no idea? Why did CD-i failed and the CD-ROM and later the DVD did succeed?

KPN is not the first one I noticed: http://www.zdnet.be/supercenter.cfm?id=28809&scid=13 and http://www.zdnet.be/news.cfm?id=36480 . For the boys, Playboy TV on a little, very tiny screen: http://www.portablegear.nl/nieuws-detail.htm?NID=1689

Although a lot of people are very sceptic the phone companies, hardware(NEC, SAMSUNG) as well as software(KPN, Telfort) are seriously pushing this new application forward.

How then could this new technology be implemented in my paper? I already mentioned remediation, but I don't think I want to emphasize too much on that. How about "textual poaching", a theory I find very interesting. Digital television has the ability, like in England is already the case, to watch whatever program at a particular time that suits you best. This gives you the opportunity to determin your own tv-flow. Perhaps it will become possible to take pieces out of every program and edit your own program. Off course, this is already possible with VCR, and digitalized footage(online), but never mobile. Direct communication with images and scenes from tv. Upload a blog directly with video: a videoblog. This combined with the already existing possibility to videotape with your phone increases the vitality of communication and sharing information.

What I find interesting is how they going to treat the problem of advertising. To do this, I will have to take a close look at England. I will have to find out whether it is succesfull, how they handle advertisement et cetera.
http://www.technologyreview.com/purchase/pdf_dl.asp?79juh=19177&hy6f0=1176 A quick scan of this text tells me that at moment of writing(November 2001) 20% of British households subscribed to digi-tv.
A quick tour on the http://www.sky.com site showed a euphorius look from the company about the company itself. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/lse/bsy.uk/reports/2003AR/2003AR/skycorporate/flash.html. At the end of 2003, SKY reached up to almost 7 million subscribers out of a total population of approx 60,000,000(http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=185), which means an estimated amount of 22,000,000 households. A quick calculation tells us that about 30% of the households have been subscribed to digi-tv.

Further investigation have to point out how advertising works on digital TV. This will provide a little insight how this issue will be treated with mobile (digital) TV.

Unfortenately I am going to be kicked out of the library any minute, so I have to continue tomorrow morning. Hope I will have the time to finish it. Sleep well.

Posted at 10:14 pm by Eelco

Eelco
May 28, 2004   01:46 PM PDT
 
I think there a lot of reasons why CD-I failed, but that wasn't really what I was aiming at. But maybe you're right about TV historically used as a passive medium(what about teletekst then?) and it takes some time to adjust to a more interactive switch in the mind.
Jules
May 27, 2004   10:28 PM PDT
 
Maybe CD-I never was succesful because:
-Bad hardware/software
-even worse content
-People often show very conservative behaviour...
TV is for passive, relax entertainment (as is DVD).
CD-ROM for active participation...

So what about game consoles? Maybe people start to get used to TV become more of an active medium...

BTW... mobile TV: take a look at Sony's PSP, Nintendo's Gameboy system and the upcoming video iPod (not that I think Apple wil make a portable video player).
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry